Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: breast-mri

Number Spacing
error

"10-15% of DCIS present as non-calcifying DCIS and are undetected on mammogram but detected on MRI. 70 -80% of cases of DCIS on MRI present as non-mass enhancement in a ductal or segmental distribution with a clumped or stippled morphological appearance. The remaining 20-30% present various enhancement patterns such as focus or a mass in a focal area or regional distribution.15"

Line 6:103 · In a number range, there should not be spaces around the hyphen ('70 -80').

"metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy of unknown primary (75 - 80% sensitive) - can spare a patient from having management because may be able to undergo BCT; management path only finds cancer in two-thirds"

Line 137:71 · In a number range, there should not be spaces around the hyphen ('75 - 80').

"recurrent breast cancer/scar changes (not usual before 2 - 3 years; peak 5 - 7 years; increased risk if EIC, younger age, positive margins (wait at least 1 month postop to scan), no radiotherapy)"

Line 151:70 · In a number range, there should not be spaces around the hyphen ('2 - 3').

"recurrent breast cancer/scar changes (not usual before 2 - 3 years; peak 5 - 7 years; increased risk if EIC, younger age, positive margins (wait at least 1 month postop to scan), no radiotherapy)"

Line 151:88 · In a number range, there should not be spaces around the hyphen ('5 - 7').
Strong List Colon Position
error

"BIRADS 0: incomplete/non-diagnostic - this category should not be used for marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), motion artifacts etc."

Line 75:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS 0:</strong> incomplete'

"BIRADS I: negative (no enhancing lesions, no benign changes such as scars, cysts etc.)"

Line 76:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS I: </strong>negative'

"BIRADS II: benign (lymph nodes, inflamed cysts, fibroadenoma, fat necrosis, foci/stippled enhancement, patchy BPE)."

Line 77:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS II:</strong> benign'

"BIRADS III: probably benign, requiring short-term follow-up in 6 months. If the finding is visible (e.g. on ultrasound), the most widely available method should be used for follow-up (should be applied only to lesions not fitting category II and IV, probably benign findings in high-risk screening should rather be biopsied than followed-up)"

Line 78:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS III:</strong> probably'

"BIRADS IV: suspicious finding requiring biopsy (biopsy should always be tried by ultrasound first as the majority of MRI lesions can be localised by targeted ultrasound)"

Line 79:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS IV: </strong>suspicious'

"BIRADS V: highly suspicious, biopsy mandatory"

Line 80:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS V:</strong> highly'

"BIRADS VI: known, histologically-verified cancer"

Line 81:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>BIRADS VI:</strong> known'
List Punctuation
error

"BIRADS II: benign (lymph nodes, inflamed cysts, fibroadenoma, fat necrosis, foci/stippled enhancement, patchy BPE)."

Line 77:135 · Do not put full stops at the end of a list item.

"positive predictive value higher the closer the lesion is to the index cancer."

Line 108:79 · Do not put full stops at the end of a list item.
Date Format
error

"20% positive predictive value (biopsy recommended in 1/3) (NEJM 29/3/2007: biopsy recommended in 12% PPV 25%);"

Line 101:72 · Use '1 January 2020' format, not '29/3/2007'.
En Dash
error

"in patients with a personal history of breast cancer, MRI sensitivity ranges from 80100%, whereas mammography sensitivity ranges from 0–53%; specificities for MRI screening in this population are relatively high but still lower than for mammography 16"

Line 195:92 · Use a hyphen-minus ('-') instead of an en-dash ('–').

"in patients with a personal history of breast cancer, MRI sensitivity ranges from 80–100%, whereas mammography sensitivity ranges from 053%; specificities for MRI screening in this population are relatively high but still lower than for mammography 16"

Line 195:144 · Use a hyphen-minus ('-') instead of an en-dash ('–').
Acronyms
warning

"T2W-TSE or STIR sequences"

Line 23:12 · 'TSE' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"almost entirely fat: ACR a"

Line 33:29 · 'ACR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"scattered fibroglandular tissue: ACR b"

Line 34:41 · 'ACR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"heterogeneous fibroglandular tissue: ACR c"

Line 35:45 · 'ACR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"extreme amount of fibroglandular tissue: ACR d"

Line 36:49 · 'ACR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), rim (rather suspicious, in particular, if centripetal, filling up over time), dark internal septations (rather benign), old BI-RADS included central enhancement (part of the lesion enhances, highly specific for fibroadenoma)"

Line 58:221 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), clumped (rather suspicious), clustered ring (rather suspicious, seldom seen), old BI-RADS included stippled, a homogeneous grainy enhancement typically benign"

Line 65:179 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"MRI BI-RADS assessment categories"

Line 73:9 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS 0: incomplete/non-diagnostic - this category should not be used for marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), motion artifacts etc."

Line 75:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS I: negative (no enhancing lesions, no benign changes such as scars, cysts etc.)"

Line 76:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS II: benign (lymph nodes, inflamed cysts, fibroadenoma, fat necrosis, foci/stippled enhancement, patchy BPE)."

Line 77:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS III: probably benign, requiring short-term follow-up in 6 months. If the finding is visible (e.g. on ultrasound), the most widely available method should be used for follow-up (should be applied only to lesions not fitting category II and IV, probably benign findings in high-risk screening should rather be biopsied than followed-up)"

Line 78:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS IV: suspicious finding requiring biopsy (biopsy should always be tried by ultrasound first as the majority of MRI lesions can be localised by targeted ultrasound)"

Line 79:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS V: highly suspicious, biopsy mandatory"

Line 80:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BIRADS VI: known, histologically-verified cancer"

Line 81:16 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Clinical history and correlation with mammography are not only diagnostically useful (e.g. to reduce the number of BIRADS III category assignments) but should be considered in the report as well in order to demonstrate to the referring physician that the clinical question has been answered."

Line 85:119 · 'BIRADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"20% positive predictive value (biopsy recommended in 1/3) (NEJM 29/3/2007: biopsy recommended in 12% PPV 25%);"

Line 101:67 · 'NEJM' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"additional sites of ipsilateral cancer more frequent if +FH (42%) & ILC (55%)"

Line 107:65 · 'FH' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"ACR guidelines"

Line 120:5 · 'ACR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"high-risk lesions: ADH/ALH/LCIS"

Line 127:30 · 'ADH' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"high-risk lesions: ADH/ALH/LCIS"

Line 127:41 · 'ALH' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"extent of disease (EOD) evaluation in ipsilateral and contralateral breast"

Line 134:27 · 'EOD' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"ACS recommendations"

Line 140:5 · 'ACS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BRCA+ : BRCA1 or BRCA2"

Line 142:8 · 'BRCA' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"first-degree relative BRCA+ and untested"

Line 143:30 · 'BRCA' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"recurrent breast cancer/scar changes (not usual before 2 - 3 years; peak 5 - 7 years; increased risk if EIC, younger age, positive margins (wait at least 1 month postop to scan), no radiotherapy)"

Line 151:119 · 'EIC' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BI-RADS category 5 lesions have a PPV of 0.714"

Line 160:8 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BI-RADS category 4 lesions have a PPV of 0.205 17"

Line 161:8 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"BI-RADS category 1 and 2 lesions have an NPV of 99%"

Line 162:8 · 'BI-RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"benign high-risk causes: ADH, LCIS"

Line 175:33 · 'ADH' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Number Formatting
warning

"positive predictive value 24% (½ invasive 4 mm median size / ½ DCIS)"

Line 91:35 · Check the number format against the style guide: '½'.

"positive predictive value 24% (½ invasive 4 mm median size / ½ DCIS)"

Line 91:65 · Check the number format against the style guide: '½'.

"ipsilateral multifocal ¾ (same quadrant >1 cm from index CA or contiguous but extends >4 cm) multicentric ¼; distribution similar to recurrent disease"

Line 106:31 · Check the number format against the style guide: '¾'.

"ipsilateral multifocal ¾ (same quadrant >1 cm from index CA or contiguous but extends >4 cm) multicentric ¼; distribution similar to recurrent disease"

Line 106:114 · Check the number format against the style guide: '¼'.
Ampersand
warning

"additional sites of ipsilateral cancer more frequent if +FH (42%) & ILC (55%)"

Line 107:73 · Radiopaedia favours the word 'and' rather than '&'.
Emphasis
warning

"BRCA1 / BRCA2 gene positivity"

Line 128:11 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: '<em>BRCA1</em></a> / <a><em>BRCA2</em>'

"BRCA+ : BRCA1 or BRCA2"

Line 142:16 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: '<em>BRCA1</em> or <em>BRCA2</em>'
List Caps
warning

"Cowden and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndromes and first-degree relatives"

Line 131:11 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.
Litotes
warning

"posterior lesion to assess chest wall invasion (pectoralis can be resected so not considered chest wall stage IIIB - serratus anterior muscle, rib, intercostal muscles)"

Line 138:86 · Consider using 'ignored' instead of 'not considered'
Strong
warning

"In non-masslike enhancement lesions, the ductal enhancement possesses the highest PPV (0.500) follow by clumped enhancement (PPV, 0.304) 17."

Line 157:4 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'In non-masslike enhancement lesions, the ductal enhancement possesses the highest PPV (0.500) follow by clumped enhancement (PPV, 0.304)<strong> </strong>'
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Use of breast MRI"

Line 7:1 · "Use of breast MRI" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Sequences used"

Line 20:1 · "Sequences used" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Lexicon"

Line 27:1 · "Lexicon" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"General breast composition"

Line 28:1 · "General breast composition" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Lesions"

Line 49:1 · "Lesions" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"MRI BI-RADS assessment categories"

Line 73:1 · "MRI BI-RADS assessment categories" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Interpretation points"

Line 84:1 · "Interpretation points" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI"

Line 86:1 · "Positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Extent of disease"

Line 95:1 · "Extent of disease" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"MRI sensitivity"

Line 113:1 · "MRI sensitivity" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Indications for breast MRI"

Line 119:1 · "Indications for breast MRI" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"ACR guidelines"

Line 120:1 · "ACR guidelines" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"ACS recommendations"

Line 140:1 · "ACS recommendations" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Other indications"

Line 148:1 · "Other indications" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Non-mass"

Line 164:1 · "Non-mass" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ductal enhancement"

Line 172:1 · "Ductal enhancement" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"MRI-detected cancers"

Line 178:1 · "MRI-detected cancers" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"False negatives"

Line 184:1 · "False negatives" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ultrasound correlation"

Line 190:1 · "Ultrasound correlation" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Parentheses
suggestion

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), rim (rather suspicious, in particular, if centripetal, filling up over time), dark internal septations (rather benign), old BI-RADS included central enhancement (part of the lesion enhances, highly specific for fibroadenoma)"

Line 58:50 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), clumped (rather suspicious), clustered ring (rather suspicious, seldom seen), old BI-RADS included stippled, a homogeneous grainy enhancement typically benign"

Line 65:50 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.

"washout (rather suspicious), plateau (non-specific), persistent (rather benign) (caveat: lymph nodes show washout but typical morphology)"

Line 70:20 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.
Commas
suggestion

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), rim (rather suspicious, in particular, if centripetal, filling up over time), dark internal septations (rather benign), old BI-RADS included central enhancement (part of the lesion enhances, highly specific for fibroadenoma)"

Line 58:65 · More than 5 commas in a single sentence might make it more difficult to read.

"internal enhancement pattern: homogeneous (rather benign), heterogeneous (non-specific), clumped (rather suspicious), clustered ring (rather suspicious, seldom seen), old BI-RADS included stippled, a homogeneous grainy enhancement typically benign"

Line 65:65 · More than 5 commas in a single sentence might make it more difficult to read.
Semicolons
suggestion

"non-mass enhancement (best diagnostic clue: margins cannot be assessed due to diffuse enhancement or grouped multiple spots; non-mass are far more difficult to distinguish and reflect different pathological entities)"

Line 62:127 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"ipsilateral multifocal ¾ (same quadrant >1 cm from index CA or contiguous but extends >4 cm) multicentric ¼; distribution similar to recurrent disease"

Line 106:115 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy of unknown primary (75 - 80% sensitive) - can spare a patient from having management because may be able to undergo BCT; management path only finds cancer in two-thirds"

Line 137:170 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"recurrent breast cancer/scar changes (not usual before 2 - 3 years; peak 5 - 7 years; increased risk if EIC, younger age, positive margins (wait at least 1 month postop to scan), no radiotherapy)"

Line 151:81 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"recurrent breast cancer/scar changes (not usual before 2 - 3 years; peak 5 - 7 years; increased risk if EIC, younger age, positive margins (wait at least 1 month postop to scan), no radiotherapy)"

Line 151:99 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"breast MRI is better than clinical assessment, mammogram, and ultrasound in correlation with pathology; pretreatment MRI should be performed and compared with MRI done after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this is particularly useful to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy allowing to identify non-responders early and to delineate the residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to determine the appropriate extent of surgical excision 15"

Line 194:110 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"in patients with a personal history of breast cancer, MRI sensitivity ranges from 80–100%, whereas mammography sensitivity ranges from 0–53%; specificities for MRI screening in this population are relatively high but still lower than for mammography 16"

Line 195:148 · Use semicolons judiciously.
Inline EG
suggestion

"BIRADS III: probably benign, requiring short-term follow-up in 6 months. If the finding is visible (e.g. on ultrasound), the most widely available method should be used for follow-up (should be applied only to lesions not fitting category II and IV, probably benign findings in high-risk screening should rather be biopsied than followed-up)"

Line 78:124 · Consider replacing a bracketed e.g. with an inline e.g. after a comma.

"problem-solving (e.g. post-operative breasts with distortion)"

Line 150:24 · Consider replacing a bracketed e.g. with an inline e.g. after a comma.
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"to assess for synchronous, multifocal or multicentric disease"

Line 152:25 · Use the Oxford comma in 'synchronous, multifocal or multicentricdisease'.