Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: plaque-rads

Acronyms
warning

"Carotid Plaque-RADS (Reporting and Data System) is a standardised, multimodality classification system for the assessment and reporting of extracranial carotid atherosclerotic plaque morphology and composition 1."

Line 1:27 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"The Plaque-RADS system is designed to complement, but not replace, stenosis grading. It serves several purposes:"

Line 4:15 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS scores range from grade 1 to 4 and increase in severity based on maximum wall thickness and the presence of complicated features."

Line 13:11 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 1"

Line 14:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 2"

Line 17:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 3"

Line 20:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 3a"

Line 24:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 3b"

Line 27:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 3c"

Line 30:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 4"

Line 33:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 4a: intraplaque haemorrhage"

Line 35:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 4b: ruptured fibrous cap"

Line 38:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Plaque-RADS 4c: intraluminal thrombus"

Line 40:12 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"The Plaque-RADS categories may be supplemented by optional ancillary features  that do not determine the main score but provide complementary vulnerability information 1:"

Line 43:15 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"[side of carotid]: [stenosis degree using NASCET protocol] / modality and Plaque-RADS score / MWT / ancillary features / modifiers"

Line 61:61 · 'NASCET' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"[side of carotid]: [stenosis degree using NASCET protocol] / modality and Plaque-RADS score / MWT / ancillary features / modifiers"

Line 61:100 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Right carotid: NASCET 50% / MRI Plaque-RADS 4a / MWT 5 mm / positive remodelling"

Line 63:27 · 'NASCET' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"Right carotid: NASCET 50% / MRI Plaque-RADS 4a / MWT 5 mm / positive remodelling"

Line 63:51 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"CTA-based assessment using the Carotid Plaque-RADS has a significant learning curve, but intermediate and experienced readers have substantial to nearly perfect inter- and intrareader agreement 3. An MRI-specific interrater reliability study for Carotid Plaque-RADS remains to be published."

Line 65:50 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"CTA-based assessment using the Carotid Plaque-RADS has a significant learning curve, but intermediate and experienced readers have substantial to nearly perfect inter- and intrareader agreement 3. An MRI-specific interrater reliability study for Carotid Plaque-RADS remains to be published."

Line 65:276 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"The validity of Plaque-RADS is supported by MRI-based studies of individual features. A meta-analysis on the prediction of recurrent stroke or transient ischaemic attack found lipid-rich necrotic core had a hazard ratio of 2.73 (95% CI: 1.04-7.16), thinning/rupture of the fibrous cap had a hazard ratio of 5.68 (95% CI: 2.40-13.47), and intraplaque haemorrhage had a hazard ratio of 7.14 (95% CI: 4.32-11.82) 4."

Line 66:27 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"CTA-based Plaque-RADS has been validated for predicting first or recurrent stroke, showing a monotonic increase in the odds of symptomatic status even after adjustment for stenosis degree and clinical covariates 2. The highest grade, Plaque-RADS 4c (intraluminal thrombus) was the strongest predictor (adjusted odds ratio 17.9, 95% CI: 6.1-52.4) 2."

Line 67:21 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"CTA-based Plaque-RADS has been validated for predicting first or recurrent stroke, showing a monotonic increase in the odds of symptomatic status even after adjustment for stenosis degree and clinical covariates 2. The highest grade, Plaque-RADS 4c (intraluminal thrombus) was the strongest predictor (adjusted odds ratio 17.9, 95% CI: 6.1-52.4) 2."

Line 67:256 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Latin
warning

"Subcategorizations may be made depending on imaging technique. In particular, MRI is the preferred modality for determining the fibrous cap status (thick plaque with thick or thin cap is graded 3a vs. 3b; healed ulcerated or recently ruptured plaque is graded 3c vs. 4b). CTA is not suitable for fibrous cap assessment (thick plaque is graded 3; ulcerated plaque is graded is 3c)."

Line 23:201 · Use appropriate Latin forms: 'vs' rather than 'vs.'.

"Subcategorizations may be made depending on imaging technique. In particular, MRI is the preferred modality for determining the fibrous cap status (thick plaque with thick or thin cap is graded 3a vs. 3b; healed ulcerated or recently ruptured plaque is graded 3c vs. 4b). CTA is not suitable for fibrous cap assessment (thick plaque is graded 3; ulcerated plaque is graded is 3c)."

Line 23:267 · Use appropriate Latin forms: 'vs' rather than 'vs.'.
EG List And
warning

"L: limited diagnostic study (e.g. blooming artifacts on CT, motion or metal artifacts)"

Line 54:41 · An e.g. list gives selected examples, so it should not end with 'and' or 'or': 'e.g. blooming artifacts on CT, motion or'.
List Caps
warning

"Right carotid: NASCET 50% / MRI Plaque-RADS 4a / MWT 5 mm / positive remodelling"

Line 63:12 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Classification"

Line 12:1 · "Classification" should be H2, not H1.

"Plaque-RADS 1"

Line 14:1 · "Plaque-RADS 1" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 2"

Line 17:1 · "Plaque-RADS 2" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 3"

Line 20:1 · "Plaque-RADS 3" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 3a"

Line 24:1 · "Plaque-RADS 3a" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 3b"

Line 27:1 · "Plaque-RADS 3b" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 3c"

Line 30:1 · "Plaque-RADS 3c" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 4"

Line 33:1 · "Plaque-RADS 4" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 4a: intraplaque haemorrhage"

Line 35:1 · "Plaque-RADS 4a: intraplaque haemorrhage" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 4b: ruptured fibrous cap"

Line 38:1 · "Plaque-RADS 4b: ruptured fibrous cap" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque-RADS 4c: intraluminal thrombus"

Line 40:1 · "Plaque-RADS 4c: intraluminal thrombus" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ancillary features"

Line 42:1 · "Ancillary features" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Modifiers"

Line 52:1 · "Modifiers" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Performance"

Line 64:1 · "Performance" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"Plaques in this category may consist of fibrous tissue, a small lipid pool or lipid-rich necrotic core, and calcifications, but no complicated plaque features (i.e. no intraplaque haemorrhage, fibrous cap rupture, or intraluminal thrombus). On all modalities, there is eccentric wall thickening"

Line 19:302 · Use the Oxford comma in 'mm, with or without'.
Commas
suggestion

"Plaques in this category may consist of fibrous tissue, a moderate-to-large lipid-rich necrotic core, calcifications, and/or healed ulceration, but no complicated plaque features (i.e. no intraplaque haemorrhage, fibrous cap rupture, or intraluminal thrombus)."

Line 22:58 · More than 5 commas in a single sentence might make it more difficult to read.
Semicolons
suggestion

"Subcategorizations may be made depending on imaging technique. In particular, MRI is the preferred modality for determining the fibrous cap status (thick plaque with thick or thin cap is graded 3a vs. 3b; healed ulcerated or recently ruptured plaque is graded 3c vs. 4b). CTA is not suitable for fibrous cap assessment (thick plaque is graded 3; ulcerated plaque is graded is 3c)."

Line 23:207 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"Subcategorizations may be made depending on imaging technique. In particular, MRI is the preferred modality for determining the fibrous cap status (thick plaque with thick or thin cap is graded 3a vs. 3b; healed ulcerated or recently ruptured plaque is graded 3c vs. 4b). CTA is not suitable for fibrous cap assessment (thick plaque is graded 3; ulcerated plaque is graded is 3c)."

Line 23:348 · Use semicolons judiciously.
There Is
suggestion

"On MRI, there is an ulceration with visible disruption of the fibrous cap (discontinuity of the band between lumen and lipid-rich necrotic core). There is usually associated intraplaque haemorrhage. CTA is not able to identify this feature."

Line 39:150 · Don't start a sentence with 'There is'.
Inline EG
suggestion

"L: limited diagnostic study (e.g. blooming artifacts on CT, motion or metal artifacts)"

Line 54:40 · Consider replacing a bracketed e.g. with an inline e.g. after a comma.