Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: risk-ratio-vs-rate-ratio-vs-odds-ratio

Acronyms
warning

"An odds ratio will approximate the risk ratio if the rare disease assumption is met. Using the 2x2 table format discussed above, the risk ratio (RR=risk in exposed/risk in unexposed) can be expressed as the following ratio:"

Line 40:149 · 'RR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"RR=a/(a+c)/b/(b+d)"

Line 41:4 · 'RR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"If “a” and “b” are both small numbers, then the equation for RR can be approximated by RR= a/c/b/d which rearranges to RR=(ad)/(bc) which is the "cross product" formula for the odds ratio. The rare disease assumption is often made when disease prevalence is less than 10%"

Line 42:65 · 'RR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"If “a” and “b” are both small numbers, then the equation for RR can be approximated by RR= a/c/b/d which rearranges to RR=(ad)/(bc) which is the "cross product" formula for the odds ratio. The rare disease assumption is often made when disease prevalence is less than 10%"

Line 42:91 · 'RR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"If “a” and “b” are both small numbers, then the equation for RR can be approximated by RR= a/c/b/d which rearranges to RR=(ad)/(bc) which is the "cross product" formula for the odds ratio. The rare disease assumption is often made when disease prevalence is less than 10%"

Line 42:123 · 'RR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Strong
warning

"RR=a/(a+c)/b/(b+d)"

Line 41:14 · Generally, don't use bold in text: '<strong>/</strong>'
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Risk ratios"

Line 2:1 · "Risk ratios" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Rate ratios"

Line 11:1 · "Rate ratios" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Odds ratios"

Line 25:1 · "Odds ratios" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Rare disease assumption"

Line 39:1 · "Rare disease assumption" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"In 1956, Doll and Hill published a cohort study in the British Medical Journal comparing the death rates of smokers and non-smokers from lung cancer after 53 months of follow-up in male physicians ≥35 years of age 4. Among smokers, (the exposed), there were 83 lung cancer deaths during 98,090 person-years, for an incidence rate of 83/98,090 or 0.84 lung cancer deaths/1,000 person-years. Among the non-smokers (the unexposed), there was 1 lung cancer death during 15,107 person-years, for an incidence rate of 1/15,107 or 0.07 lung cancer deaths/1,000 person-years. The rate ratio for the “Doctor’s study” as published in 1956 is IR exposed/IR unexposed = 0.84/0.07 = 12. This means that smokers died of lung cancer at 12 times the rate of non-smokers."

Line 23:7 · Use the Oxford comma in '1956, Doll and Hill'.

"In 1950, Doll and Hill published a case-control study in the British Medical Journal comparing the exposure to smoking in subjects with lung cancer to hospitalised controls without lung cancer 6. There were 688 exposed cases (cell “a”), 21 unexposed controls (cell “b”), 650 exposed controls (cell “c”), and 59 unexposed controls (cell ”d”), resulting in an odds ratio = (ad) / (bc) = (688x59) / (650x21) = 40,592/13,650 = 2.97. In words, the odds of smoking among the subjects with lung cancer (cases) were 2.97 times greater than the odds of smoking among the subjects without lung cancer (controls). This study was one of the earliest that showed an association between smoking and lung cancer."

Line 38:7 · Use the Oxford comma in '1950, Doll and Hill'.
Commas
suggestion

"In 1956, Doll and Hill published a cohort study in the British Medical Journal comparing the death rates of smokers and non-smokers from lung cancer after 53 months of follow-up in male physicians ≥35 years of age 4. Among smokers, (the exposed), there were 83 lung cancer deaths during 98,090 person-years, for an incidence rate of 83/98,090 or 0.84 lung cancer deaths/1,000 person-years. Among the non-smokers (the unexposed), there was 1 lung cancer death during 15,107 person-years, for an incidence rate of 1/15,107 or 0.07 lung cancer deaths/1,000 person-years. The rate ratio for the “Doctor’s study” as published in 1956 is IR exposed/IR unexposed = 0.84/0.07 = 12. This means that smokers died of lung cancer at 12 times the rate of non-smokers."

Line 23:245 · More than 5 commas in a single sentence might make it more difficult to read.

"In 1950, Doll and Hill published a case-control study in the British Medical Journal comparing the exposure to smoking in subjects with lung cancer to hospitalised controls without lung cancer 6. There were 688 exposed cases (cell “a”), 21 unexposed controls (cell “b”), 650 exposed controls (cell “c”), and 59 unexposed controls (cell ”d”), resulting in an odds ratio = (ad) / (bc) = (688x59) / (650x21) = 40,592/13,650 = 2.97. In words, the odds of smoking among the subjects with lung cancer (cases) were 2.97 times greater than the odds of smoking among the subjects without lung cancer (controls). This study was one of the earliest that showed an association between smoking and lung cancer."

Line 38:250 · More than 5 commas in a single sentence might make it more difficult to read.
Parentheses
suggestion

"In 1950, Doll and Hill published a case-control study in the British Medical Journal comparing the exposure to smoking in subjects with lung cancer to hospitalised controls without lung cancer 6. There were 688 exposed cases (cell “a”), 21 unexposed controls (cell “b”), 650 exposed controls (cell “c”), and 59 unexposed controls (cell ”d”), resulting in an odds ratio = (ad) / (bc) = (688x59) / (650x21) = 40,592/13,650 = 2.97. In words, the odds of smoking among the subjects with lung cancer (cases) were 2.97 times greater than the odds of smoking among the subjects without lung cancer (controls). This study was one of the earliest that showed an association between smoking and lung cancer."

Line 38:240 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.
Links