"So, what should a perfect case look like? Over time, the quality of contributions to Radiopaedia has grown, and what is considered a "perfect case" has also evolved. Please refer to the case publishing guidelines for a general set of instructions. You also can get a sense of how close your case is to being perfect by reviewing the case completeness percentage, although this does not consider the quality of the case itself."
"one or two sentences encompassing the clinical presentation or indication for imaging should be provided, e.g. "Sudden onset headache.""
"So, what should a perfect case look like? Over time, the quality of contributions to Radiopaedia has grown, and what is considered a "perfect case" has also evolved. Please refer to the case publishing guidelines for a general set of instructions. You also can get a sense of how close your case is to being perfect by reviewing the case completeness percentage, although this does not consider the quality of the case itself."
"a clear and concise case title is vital and is usually the diagnosis of the case, e.g. "Hepatoma", not "Interesting patient with hepatoma""
"a clear and concise case title is vital and is usually the diagnosis of the case, e.g. "Hepatoma", not "Interesting patient with hepatoma""
"clinical specialty, e.g. "emergency medicine", "trauma", or "general surgery")"
"a short 'report-like' description of the images provided is required and should NOT be a full formal radiology report"
"Meckel diverticulum causing intussusception"
Expected headings
"Case title"
"Diagnostic certainty"
"System"
"Tags"
"Presentation"
"Patient data"
"Images"
"Modality and image labels"
"Findings"
"Annotations"
"Case discussion"
"Examples"
"when histologically confirmed, macroscopic and microscopic images from the same patient are also uploaded"
"often numerous systems are appropriate and useful (e.g. vesicoureteric reflux should have both Paediatrics and Urogenital systems)"