Radiopaedia Helpers

ctmri-li-rads

Quotes

error

""washout,""

Line 139:27 · Commas and periods go outside quotation marks (in nearly all circumstances).

Headings Case

warning

"LR-1 (100% benign)"

Line 95:5 · 'LR-1 (100% benign)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"LR-2 (probably benign)"

Line 111:5 · 'LR-2 (probably benign)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"LR-3 (intermediate probability for HCC)"

Line 119:5 · 'LR-3 (intermediate probability for HCC)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"LR-4 (probably HCC)"

Line 144:5 · 'LR-4 (probably HCC)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"LR-5 (100% definite HCC)"

Line 205:5 · 'LR-5 (100% definite HCC)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

Strong

warning

"mass with hepatic arterial phase iso- or hypoenhancement"

Line 127:14 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'hepatic arterial phase iso- or hypoenhancement'

"mass with hepatic arterial phase hyperenhancement"

Line 138:14 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'hepatic arterial phase hyperenhancement'

"LR-M for liver lesions that are probably or definitely malignant, but not an appearance compatible with HCC. Examples of this include:"

Line 237:4 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'LR-M'

"LR-NC (LR-non-categorisable) for lesions in which the technical quality of the MRI does not allow evaluation of the major features."

Line 250:4 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'LR-NC '

"LR-TIV for unequivocal enhancing soft tissue invading the portal vein, regardless of whether an underlying parenchymal mass is visible. This is important to report since it is a contraindication to liver transplantation. Malignancies other than HCC can invade the portal venous system."

Line 251:4 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'LR-TIV'

Emphasis

warning

"no more than one"

Line 129:16 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'no more than one '

"two or more of the following"

Line 152:4 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'two or more'

"one or more of the following"

Line 163:4 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'one or more '

"one or more of the following"

Line 179:4 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'one or more '

"no major suspicious features:"

Line 194:4 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'no '

"single major suspicious feature (washout or threshold growth), excluding enhancing "capsule" (LR-4)"

Line 212:8 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'single '

"two or more of the following"

Line 214:4 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'two or more'

"one or more of the following"

Line 226:5 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: 'one or more'

Litotes

warning

"LR-NC (LR-non-categorisable) for lesions in which the technical quality of the MRI does not allow evaluation of the major features."

Line 250:109 · Consider using 'prevented' instead of 'not allow'

Acronyms

warning

"RADS (Reporting and Data Systems)"

Line 270:15 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

Headings Valid

warning

Expected headings

H1 Terminology
H1 Usage
H1 Epidemiology
H2 Risk factors
H2 Associations
H1 Clinical presentation
H2 Complications
H1 Diagnosis
H2 Diagnostic criteria
H2 Diagnostic clues
H1 Pathology
H2 Aetiology
H2 Location
H2 Classification
H2 Macroscopic appearance
H2 Microscopic appearance
H2 Immunophenotype
H2 Markers
H2 Genetics
H1 Radiographic features
H2 Plain radiograph
H2 Mammography
H2 Antenatal ultrasound
H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
H2 Ultrasound
H2 CT
H3 Dual-energy CT
H2 Angiography (DSA)
H2 MRI
H2 CT/MRI
H2 Nuclear medicine
H3 PET-CT
H3 PET-MRI
H1 Radiology report
H1 Treatment and prognosis
H2 Complications
H1 History and etymology
H1 Differential diagnosis
H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
H1 Practical points
H1 See also

"Major criteria"

Line 6:1 · "Major criteria" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ancillary features"

Line 53:1 · "Ancillary features" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Classification"

Line 92:1 · "Classification" should be H2, not H1.

"LR-1 (100% benign)"

Line 95:1 · "LR-1 (100% benign)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"LR-2 (probably benign)"

Line 111:1 · "LR-2 (probably benign)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"LR-3 (intermediate probability for HCC)"

Line 119:1 · "LR-3 (intermediate probability for HCC)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"LR-4 (probably HCC)"

Line 144:1 · "LR-4 (probably HCC)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"LR-5 (100% definite HCC)"

Line 205:1 · "LR-5 (100% definite HCC)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Special categories"

Line 236:1 · "Special categories" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

Parentheses

suggestion

"CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is an algorithm for diagnosing and staging hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (CT/MRI Diagnostic LI-RADS) or assessing the response of HCC to locoregional treatment (CT/MRI Treatment Response LI-RADS) using CT or MRI with extracellular contrast agents or MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents³."

Line 1:76 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.

Inline EG

suggestion

"only apply this criterion if the lesion is definitely a mass (e.g. not perfusion alteration)"

Line 49:69 · Consider replacing a bracketed e.g. with an inline e.g. after a comma.

Links

hepatocellular-carcinoma