Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: equivalent-dose

Emphasis
warning

"Equivalent dose (symbol HT) is a measure of the radiation dose to tissue where an attempt has been made to allow for the different relative biological effects of different types of ionising radiation. In quantitative terms, equivalent dose is less fundamental than absorbed dose, but it is more biologically significant. Equivalent dose is measured using the sievert but rem is still commonly used (1 Sv = 100 rem)."

Line 1:53 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: '<em>H<sub>T</sub></em>'

"Equivalent dose (HT) is calculated by multiplying the absorbed dose to the organ or tissue (DT) with the radiation weighting factor, wR. This factor is dependent on the type and energy of the incident radiation. The value of wR is 1 for x-rays, gamma rays and beta particles, but higher for protons (wR = 2), neutrons (wR is between 5 and 20 depending on energy), alpha particles and heavy fragments (wR = 20) etc."

Line 2:21 · Italics should be used only in exceptional circumstances: '<em>H<sub>T</sub></em>) is calculated by multiplying the absorbed dose to the organ or tissue (<em>D<sub>T</sub></em>) with the <a>radiation weighting factor</a>, <em>w<sub>R</sub></em>. This factor is dependent on the type and energy of the incident radiation. The value of <em>w<sub>R</sub></em> is 1 for x-rays, <a>gamma rays</a> and beta particles, but higher for protons (<em>w<sub>R </sub></em>=<em><sub> </sub></em>2), neutrons (<em>w<sub>R </sub></em>is between 5 and 20 depending on energy), <a>alpha particles</a> and heavy fragments (<em>w<sub>R </sub></em>'
Acronyms
warning

"The numerical values given above are valid for legal EU regulations for calculating equivalent dose in an organ or tissue. In 2007, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) published a set of radiation weighting factors (ICRP Publ. 103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection) 3 as below:"

Line 3:57 · 'EU' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Colons
warning

"The numerical values given above are valid for legal EU regulations for calculating equivalent dose in an organ or tissue. In 2007, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) published a set of radiation weighting factors (ICRP Publ. 103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection) 3 as below:"

Line 3:264 · The first word after a colon should almost always be lowercase. In this case, it's not: ': The 2007'.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Permissible dose"

Line 11:1 · "Permissible dose" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Parentheses
suggestion

"Equivalent dose (HT) is calculated by multiplying the absorbed dose to the organ or tissue (DT) with the radiation weighting factor, wR. This factor is dependent on the type and energy of the incident radiation. The value of wR is 1 for x-rays, gamma rays and beta particles, but higher for protons (wR = 2), neutrons (wR is between 5 and 20 depending on energy), alpha particles and heavy fragments (wR = 20) etc."

Line 2:20 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.