Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: glenoid-labral-tear

glenoid-labral-tear
Units
error

"There is an ongoing debate on whether direct MR arthrography is superior to conventional MR in detecting labral tears. A 2012 meta-analysis 4 demonstrated the accuracy of MR arthrography was marginally superior, with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 76% for conventional MR, and a specificity of 93% vs. 87%."

Line 40:149 · Put a space between the number and the unit in '4d'.
Adjectival Hyphens
error

"pseudo-SLAP lesion"

Line 53:8 · Only use medical adjectival hyphens where the letters at the end and start of the compound word are the same, e.g. post-transplant. In this case, don't use the hyphen: 'pseudo-SLAP'.
Acronyms
warning

"superior labrumSLAP lesion"

Line 14:31 · 'SLAP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"GLAD"

Line 19:8 · 'GLAD' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"ALPSA"

Line 20:8 · 'ALPSA' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"posterior GLAD"

Line 25:15 · 'GLAD' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"POLPSA"

Line 26:8 · 'POLPSA' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"On conventional MR labral tears are best seen on fat-saturated fluid-sensitive sequences. On MR arthrography it is customary to combine T1, T1 FS and T2 FS sequences for further assessment. Imaging in three planes is advisable and additional orthogonal planes may be included in the protocol for a detailed assessment of the lesion."

Line 39:147 · 'FS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"On conventional MR labral tears are best seen on fat-saturated fluid-sensitive sequences. On MR arthrography it is customary to combine T1, T1 FS and T2 FS sequences for further assessment. Imaging in three planes is advisable and additional orthogonal planes may be included in the protocol for a detailed assessment of the lesion."

Line 39:157 · 'FS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"MR arthrography has excellent accuracy in differentiating between SLAP lesions and anatomic variants."

Line 42:70 · 'SLAP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"CT arthrography has been reported to have 97.3% accuracy for detecting Bankart lesions and 86.3% for SLAP lesions 4, which makes it comparable with MR arthrography and gives the possibility to examine the patients with contraindications to an MR examination. Apart from that, CT is superior to MR in assessing bony structures, so this modality is helpful in detecting co-existing small glenoid rim fractures."

Line 44:105 · 'SLAP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"There are a number of anatomical labral variants located between 11 and 3 o'clock, which can be mistaken for a SLAP tear:"

Line 48:115 · 'SLAP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"pseudo-SLAP lesion"

Line 53:15 · 'SLAP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
List Caps
warning

"Bankart lesion"

Line 17:8 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.

"Perthes lesion"

Line 18:8 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.

"Kim lesion"

Line 27:8 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.
Latin
warning

"There is an ongoing debate on whether direct MR arthrography is superior to conventional MR in detecting labral tears. A 2012 meta-analysis 4 demonstrated the accuracy of MR arthrography was marginally superior, with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 76% for conventional MR, and a specificity of 93% vs. 87%."

Line 40:253 · Use appropriate Latin forms: 'vs' rather than 'vs.'.

"There is an ongoing debate on whether direct MR arthrography is superior to conventional MR in detecting labral tears. A 2012 meta-analysis 4 demonstrated the accuracy of MR arthrography was marginally superior, with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 76% for conventional MR, and a specificity of 93% vs. 87%."

Line 40:307 · Use appropriate Latin forms: 'vs' rather than 'vs.'.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Localisation"

Line 12:1 · "Localisation" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Associations"

Line 32:1 · "Associations" should be H2, not H1.

"CT arthrography"

Line 43:1 · "CT arthrography" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
There Is
suggestion

"There is an ongoing debate on whether direct MR arthrography is superior to conventional MR in detecting labral tears. A 2012 meta-analysis 4 demonstrated the accuracy of MR arthrography was marginally superior, with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 76% for conventional MR, and a specificity of 93% vs. 87%."

Line 40:4 · Don't start a sentence with 'There is'.

"There are a number of anatomical labral variants located between 11 and 3 o'clock, which can be mistaken for a SLAP tear:"

Line 48:4 · Don't start a sentence with 'There are'.
Links
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0