Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: paraganglioma-of-the-coccyx

Strong List Colon Position
error

"T1: hypointense"

Line 25:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>T1:</strong> hypointense'

"T2: hyperintense"

Line 26:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>T2: </strong>hyperintense'

"T1 C+ (Gd): homogeneous avid enhancement"

Line 27:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>T1 C+ (Gd): </strong>homogeneous'
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"The term "glomus" was historically used to describe certain types of neuroendocrine tumours arising from paraganglia. The term is, however, imprecise and can be confused with the glomus bodies and tumours that arise from them. It can also be mixed up with glomus tumours of the subcutaneous skin, also referred to as glomangioma."

Line 3:135 · Use the Oxford comma in 'however, imprecise and can'.

"Patients complain of coccygodynia, thus pain, tenderness and sensitivity to cold 1-3 as described with peripheral extracoccygeal glomangiomas."

Line 8:51 · Use the Oxford comma in 'pain, tenderness and sensitivity'.

"Glomus cells usually express smooth muscle actin, vimentin and neurone specific enolase 1,2."

Line 16:50 · Use the Oxford comma in 'actin, vimentin and neurone'.

"location, size and signal characteristics of the lesion"

Line 32:8 · Use the Oxford comma in 'location, size and signal'.

"form, margins and transition zone"

Line 33:8 · Use the Oxford comma in 'form, margins and transition'.
There Is
suggestion

"There are no reports about the appearance of coccygeal glomangiomas in the literature. However, it should look like an ovoid well-circumscribed lesion with soft tissue density, with possible bone erosion ref."

Line 21:4 · Don't start a sentence with 'There are'.
Biographical Lifespan
suggestion

"History and etymology"

Line 39:1 · A bold element in the History and etymology section should be a person; it would be useful to have their lifespan details: '<h4>History and etymology</h4> <p>The glomus coccygeum was first identified by <strong>Hubert von Luschka</strong><sup> 5</sup> (1820-1875), who compared it to the glomus caroticum. Its vascular origin was first recognised by <strong>Julius Arnold</strong> (1835-1915), but it was not until 1942 when <strong>William H. Hollinshead</strong> '