Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: child-pugh-score-chronic-liver-disease

Strong List Colon Position
error

"class A: 5-6 points"

Line 51:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>class A:</strong> 5'

"class B: 7-9 points"

Line 52:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>class B:</strong> 7'

"class C: 10-15 points"

Line 53:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong>class C:</strong> 10'
En Dash
error

"68170: 2 points"

Line 58:10 · Use a hyphen-minus ('-') instead of an en-dash ('–').
Strong
warning

"This score was initially devised by Child and Turcotte in 1964 to risk-stratify patients with portal hypertension undergoing shunt surgery. It was revised in 1972 by Pugh with the replacement of nutritional status with the more objective INR/prothrombin 4,5. Subsequently, it has been a commonly used tool, along with the MELD score, to assess the prognosis of cirrhosis patients 5."

Line 3:40 · Generally, don't use bold in text: '<strong>Child</strong>'

"This score was initially devised by Child and Turcotte in 1964 to risk-stratify patients with portal hypertension undergoing shunt surgery. It was revised in 1972 by Pugh with the replacement of nutritional status with the more objective INR/prothrombin 4,5. Subsequently, it has been a commonly used tool, along with the MELD score, to assess the prognosis of cirrhosis patients 5."

Line 3:67 · Generally, don't use bold in text: '<strong>Turcotte</strong>'

"This score was initially devised by Child and Turcotte in 1964 to risk-stratify patients with portal hypertension undergoing shunt surgery. It was revised in 1972 by Pugh with the replacement of nutritional status with the more objective INR/prothrombin 4,5. Subsequently, it has been a commonly used tool, along with the MELD score, to assess the prognosis of cirrhosis patients 5."

Line 3:211 · Generally, don't use bold in text: '<strong>Pugh</strong>'