Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: coronary-artery-disease-reporting-and-data-system-3

Headings Spacing
error

"CAD-RADS 0 "

Line 20:1 · Never put spaces at either end of headings.

"CAD-RADS 0 "

Line 115:1 · Never put spaces at either end of headings.
Strong List Colon Position
error

" 4a: 70-99% severe coronary stenosis"

Line 81:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4a:</strong> 70'

" 4a: consider invasive coronary angiography or functional assessment"

Line 88:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4a: </strong>consider'

" 4b: invasive coronary angiography (recommended)"

Line 89:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4b:</strong> invasive'

" 4a: 70-99% severe coronary stenosis"

Line 177:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4a:</strong> 70'

" 4b: left main >50% stenosis or three-vessel obstructive disease with ≥70% stenosis"

Line 178:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4b:</strong> left'

" 4a: consider invasive coronary angiography or functional assessment"

Line 185:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4a:</strong> consider'

" 4b: invasive coronary angiography (recommended)"

Line 186:8 · When enboldening an intro, the colon should not be bold. '<strong> 4b:</strong> invasive'
Acronyms
warning

"The system was created by a collaboration of the Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) and was also endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The CAD-RADS system was initially published in 2016 1. The system was then updated to CAD-RADS 2.0 in 2022 and is an expert document intended to serve as a practice guideline 2. This version incorporates several methods for the categorisation, including descriptors of overall coronary plaque burden and options to include CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion results for the assessment of lesion-specific ischaemia if obtained 2. It also now includes the description of non-atherosclerotic coronary abnormalities as a separate modifier “E” for exception 2."

Line 3:215 · 'NASCI' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"modifier HRP: high-risk plaque (updated from V = vulnerable)"

Line 234:17 · 'HRP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"ACC/AHA classification of coronary lesions"

Line 288:15 · 'AHA' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"RADS (Reporting and Data Systems)"

Line 290:11 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Strong
warning

"maximal stenosis: 0% - no coronary luminal stenosis and no plaque"

Line 23:8 · Generally, don't use bold in text: 'maximal stenosis: 0% -<strong> </strong>no coronary luminal stenosis and no plaque'
Headings Case
warning

"CAD-RADS N"

Line 108:5 · 'CAD-RADS N' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"CAD-RADS N"

Line 206:5 · 'CAD-RADS N' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Non-diagnostic (N)"

Line 241:5 · 'Non-diagnostic (N)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Ischaemia (I)"

Line 251:5 · 'Ischaemia (I)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Stent (S)"

Line 258:5 · 'Stent (S)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Graft (G)"

Line 260:5 · 'Graft (G)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Exceptions (E)"

Line 262:5 · 'Exceptions (E)' should use sentence-style capitalization.
List Caps
warning

"Tn+: consider other causes of increased troponin"

Line 123:8 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.

"Tn+: consider other causes of increased troponin"

Line 136:8 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.
Colons
warning

"CAC-DRS: Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System"

Line 289:18 · The first word after a colon should almost always be lowercase. In this case, it's not: ': Coronary Artery'.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"CAD-RADS categories"

Line 18:1 · "CAD-RADS categories" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Stable chest pain"

Line 19:1 · "Stable chest pain" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 0 "

Line 20:1 · "CAD-RADS 0 " is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 1"

Line 32:1 · "CAD-RADS 1" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 2"

Line 47:1 · "CAD-RADS 2" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 3"

Line 61:1 · "CAD-RADS 3" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 4"

Line 75:1 · "CAD-RADS 4" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 5"

Line 95:1 · "CAD-RADS 5" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS N"

Line 108:1 · "CAD-RADS N" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Acute chest pain"

Line 114:1 · "Acute chest pain" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 0 "

Line 115:1 · "CAD-RADS 0 " is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 1"

Line 128:1 · "CAD-RADS 1" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 2"

Line 142:1 · "CAD-RADS 2" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 3"

Line 156:1 · "CAD-RADS 3" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 4"

Line 171:1 · "CAD-RADS 4" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS 5"

Line 192:1 · "CAD-RADS 5" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CAD-RADS N"

Line 206:1 · "CAD-RADS N" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Plaque burden"

Line 212:1 · "Plaque burden" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Modifiers"

Line 230:1 · "Modifiers" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Non-diagnostic (N)"

Line 241:1 · "Non-diagnostic (N)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"High-risk plaque (HRP)"

Line 243:1 · "High-risk plaque (HRP)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ischaemia (I)"

Line 251:1 · "Ischaemia (I)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Stent (S)"

Line 258:1 · "Stent (S)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Graft (G)"

Line 260:1 · "Graft (G)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Exceptions (E)"

Line 262:1 · "Exceptions (E)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Examples"

Line 273:1 · "Examples" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"External links"

Line 284:1 · "External links" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Biographical Lifespan
suggestion

"History and etymology"

Line 2:1 · A bold element in the History and etymology section should be a person; it would be useful to have their lifespan details: '<h4>History and etymology</h4> <p>The system was created by a collaboration of the Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the <a>American College of Radiology (ACR)</a>, and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) and was also endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The CAD-RADS system was initially published in 2016 <sup>1</sup>. The system was then updated to CAD-RADS 2.0 in 2022 and is an expert document intended to serve as a practice guideline <sup>2</sup>. This version incorporates several methods for the categorisation, including descriptors of overall coronary plaque burden and options to include CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion results for the assessment of lesion-specific ischaemia if obtained <sup>2</sup>. It also now includes the description of non-atherosclerotic coronary abnormalities as a separate modifier “E” for exception <sup>2</sup>.</p> <h4>Usage</h4> <p>The usage of the CAD-RADS 2.0 system includes the following <sup>2</sup>:</p> <ul> <li><p>application on a per-patient basis in two different clinical settings</p></li> <li><p>description of the most clinically relevant and usually most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis (applies for vessels ≥1.5 mm in diameter)</p></li> <li><p>different methods for the estimation, quantification and description of the overall plaque burden</p></li> <li><p>option to include lesion-specific CT-based <a>myocardial ischaemia</a> testing results obtained by CT-FFR or CT perfusion</p></li> <li><p>guide to patient management based on the above findings</p></li> </ul> <p>The different clinical settings in which CAD-RADS is used include <sup>1-3</sup>:</p> <ul> <li><p>patients presenting with stable chest pain</p></li> <li><p>patients presenting with acute chest pain</p></li> </ul> <h4>CAD-RADS categories</h4> <h5>Stable chest pain</h5> <h6>CAD-RADS 0 </h6> <ul> <li><p>interpretation: absence of <a>coronary artery disease</a></p></li> <li><p>maximal stenosis: 0% -<strong> </strong>no coronary luminal stenosis and no plaque</p></li> <li> <p>management recommendations:</p> <ul> <li><p>no further cardiac investigation</p></li> <li><p>reassurance; consider nonatherosclerotic causes of chest pain </p></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h6>CAD-RADS 1</h6> <ul> <li><p>interpretation: minimal nonobstructive coronary artery disease</p></li> <li><p>maximal stenosis: 1-24% - minimal stenosis or plaque with no stenosis (includes positive remodelling)</p></li> <li> <p>management recommendations:</p> <ul> <li><p>no further cardiac investigation</p></li> <li><p>consider nonatherosclerotic causes of chest pain </p></li> <li><p>P1: consider preventive therapy and risk factor modification </p></li> <li><p>P2: preventive therapy and risk factor modification</p></li> <li><p>P3 or P4: aggressive preventive therapy and risk factor modification</p></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h6>CAD-RADS 2</h6> <ul> <li><p>interpretation: mild nonobstructive coronary artery disease</p></li> <li><p>maximal stenosis: 25-49% - mild stenosis</p></li> <li> <p>management recommendations:</p> <ul> <li><p>no further cardiac investigation</p></li> <li><p>consider nonatherosclerotic causes of chest pain </p></li> <li><p>P1 or P2: preventive therapy and risk factor modification </p></li> <li><p>P3 or P4: aggressive preventive therapy and risk factor modification</p></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h6>CAD-RADS 3</h6> <ul> <li><p>interpretation: moderate stenosis</p></li> <li><p>maximal stenosis: 50-69% - moderate stenosis</p></li> <li> <p>management recommendations:</p> <ul> <li><p>consider functional assessment</p></li> <li><p>P1-P4: aggressive preventive therapy and risk factor modification</p></li> <li><p>consider other treatments, including anti-anginal therapy as per guidelines</p></li> <li><p>I+: consider invasive coronary angiography, in particular in the setting of persistent symptoms despite optimal medical therapy</p></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h6>CAD-RADS 4</h6> <ul> <li><p>interpretation: severe stenosis</p></li> <li> <p>maximal stenosis:</p> <ul> <li><p><strong> 4a:</strong> '
Parentheses
suggestion

"The system was created by a collaboration of the Society for Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) and was also endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The CAD-RADS system was initially published in 2016 1. The system was then updated to CAD-RADS 2.0 in 2022 and is an expert document intended to serve as a practice guideline 2. This version incorporates several methods for the categorisation, including descriptors of overall coronary plaque burden and options to include CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion results for the assessment of lesion-specific ischaemia if obtained 2. It also now includes the description of non-atherosclerotic coronary abnormalities as a separate modifier “E” for exception 2."

Line 3:100 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.

"severe amount of plaque, presence of patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and expected occluded proximal LAD, mild non-obstructive stenosis in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex artery (LCx): CAD-RADS 2/P3/G"

Line 279:88 · Use parentheses judiciously. There are at least 3 sets in this paragraph.
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"different methods for the estimation, quantification and description of the overall plaque burden"

Line 9:34 · Use the Oxford comma in 'estimation, quantification and description'.
Semicolons
suggestion

"reassurance; consider nonatherosclerotic causes of chest pain"

Line 28:19 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"The modifier “S” marks the presence of a coronary stent; coronary in-stent restenosis and stent occlusion are classified like the native coronary arteries."

Line 259:66 · Use semicolons judiciously.