Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: d-dimer-1

Headings Case
warning

"Validated uses of D-dimer"

Line 2:5 · 'Validated uses of D-dimer' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"Non-validated uses of D-dimer"

Line 17:5 · 'Non-validated uses of D-dimer' should use sentence-style capitalization.
List Caps
warning

"Wells criteria for pulmonary embolism"

Line 7:11 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.

"Wells criteria for DVT"

Line 8:11 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.

"Geneva score"

Line 9:11 · In general, we don't start a list item with a capital letter. Exceptions are proper nouns.
Acronyms
warning

"pulmonary embolism rule out criteria (PERC)"

Line 10:49 · 'PERC' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"ruling out aortic dissection in low-risk patients (ADD-RS plus D-dimer)"

Line 20:69 · 'ADD-RS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"In a large study in 2016, an extremely elevated level was arbitrarily defined as >5,000 µg/L FEU 4. An older study from 2011 defined an extremely elevated D-dimer as >50,000 µg/L FEU 9. A study series of adult-onset Still disease only found very high D-dimers in four of 22 patients, defined in this case as >5,000 µg/L FEU 11."

Line 49:97 · 'FEU' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"In a large study in 2016, an extremely elevated level was arbitrarily defined as >5,000 µg/L FEU 4. An older study from 2011 defined an extremely elevated D-dimer as >50,000 µg/L FEU 9. A study series of adult-onset Still disease only found very high D-dimers in four of 22 patients, defined in this case as >5,000 µg/L FEU 11."

Line 49:194 · 'FEU' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"In a large study in 2016, an extremely elevated level was arbitrarily defined as >5,000 µg/L FEU 4. An older study from 2011 defined an extremely elevated D-dimer as >50,000 µg/L FEU 9. A study series of adult-onset Still disease only found very high D-dimers in four of 22 patients, defined in this case as >5,000 µg/L FEU 11."

Line 49:346 · 'FEU' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"massive GI bleeding (and other sites)"

Line 61:16 · 'GI' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"HELLP syndrome"

Line 62:11 · 'HELLP' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Validated uses of D-dimer"

Line 2:1 · "Validated uses of D-dimer" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Non-validated uses of D-dimer"

Line 17:1 · "Non-validated uses of D-dimer" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Conditions associated with a raised D-dimer"

Line 25:1 · "Conditions associated with a raised D-dimer" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Conditions associated with an extremely high D-dimer"

Line 48:1 · "Conditions associated with an extremely high D-dimer" is not a recognised heading for this article type.