Radiopaedia Helpers

midventricular-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy

Acronyms

warning

"ECV: increased"

Line 49:8 · 'ECV' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

"IRGE/PSIR:"

Line 53:9 · 'PSIR' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.

Headings Valid

warning

Expected headings

H1 Terminology
H1 Usage
H1 Epidemiology
H2 Risk factors
H2 Associations
H1 Clinical presentation
H2 Complications
H1 Diagnosis
H2 Diagnostic criteria
H2 Diagnostic clues
H1 Pathology
H2 Aetiology
H2 Location
H2 Classification
H2 Macroscopic appearance
H2 Microscopic appearance
H2 Immunophenotype
H2 Markers
H2 Genetics
H1 Radiographic features
H2 Plain radiograph
H2 Mammography
H2 Antenatal ultrasound
H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
H2 Ultrasound
H2 CT
H3 Dual-energy CT
H2 Angiography (DSA)
H2 MRI
H2 CT/MRI
H2 Nuclear medicine
H3 PET-CT
H3 PET-MRI
H1 Radiology report
H1 Treatment and prognosis
H2 Complications
H1 History and etymology
H1 Differential diagnosis
H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
H1 Practical points
H1 See also

"Association"

Line 4:1 · "Association" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Echocardiography"

Line 31:1 · "Echocardiography" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

There Is

suggestion

"A peak gradient of ≥30 mmHg in the left ventricular midcavity is the diagnostic threshold for midventricular obstruction, with higher gradients (≥50 mmHg) generally considered to be haemodynamically significant ^1-3. There are apparently significant variations in the size of the obstructed apical cavity ⁴."

Line 26:231 · Don't start a sentence with 'There are'.

Links

hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy