Login
Toggle sidebar

Lint: ceus-li-rads-2

ceus-li-rads-2
Citation Preceding Space
error

"arterioportal shunts or vascular pseudolesions are not depicted with CEUS, although transient hepatic echogenicity differences (THED) can still be seen2"

Line 11:166 · Citations must have a preceding space, e.g. needs evidence <sup>2</sup>. '<sup>2</sup>'
Uncomparables
error

"multiple injections of microbubble intravascular contrast can be performed, allowing for more complete assessment of an observation"

Line 12:97 · 'more complete' is not comparable
Optional Plurals
error

"identify and categorise observation(s)"

Line 33:32 · Do not use plurals in parentheses such as in 'observation(s)'.
Number Comparisons
error

"early: < 60 seconds after injection"

Line 70:15 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.

"distinct isoenhancing solid nodule < 10 mm"

Line 124:39 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.

"nodule < 20 mm no APHE and no washout, or with late and mild washout"

Line 132:15 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.

"nodule < 10 mm with APHE and no washout"

Line 134:15 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.

"nodule < 10 mm with APHE, and with late and mild washout"

Line 139:15 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.

"early (< 60 s) washout, or"

Line 147:15 · There should never be a space after less and greater than signs.
Headings Case
warning

"CEUS LR-1 (definitely benign)"

Line 115:5 · 'CEUS LR-1 (definitely benign)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"CEUS LR-2 (probably benign)"

Line 121:5 · 'CEUS LR-2 (probably benign)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"CEUS LR-4 (probably HCC)"

Line 136:5 · 'CEUS LR-4 (probably HCC)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"CEUS LR-5 (definitely HCC)"

Line 142:5 · 'CEUS LR-5 (definitely HCC)' should use sentence-style capitalization.

"CEUS LR-NC"

Line 158:5 · 'CEUS LR-NC' should use sentence-style capitalization.
Acronyms
warning

"RADS (Reporting and Data Systems)"

Line 219:15 · 'RADS' has no definition. Spell it out if it's unfamiliar to the audience.
Headings Valid
warning

Expected headings

  • H1 Terminology
  • H1 Usage
  • H1 Epidemiology
  • H2 Risk factors
  • H2 Associations
  • H1 Clinical presentation
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 Diagnosis
  • H2 Diagnostic criteria
  • H2 Diagnostic clues
  • H1 Pathology
  • H2 Aetiology
  • H2 Location
  • H2 Classification
  • H2 Macroscopic appearance
  • H2 Microscopic appearance
  • H2 Immunophenotype
  • H2 Markers
  • H2 Genetics
  • H1 Radiographic features
  • H2 Plain radiograph
  • H2 Mammography
  • H2 Antenatal ultrasound
  • H2 Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • H2 Ultrasound
  • H2 CT
  • H3 Dual-energy CT
  • H2 Angiography (DSA)
  • H2 MRI
  • H2 CT/MRI
  • H2 Nuclear medicine
  • H3 PET-CT
  • H3 PET-MRI
  • H1 Radiology report
  • H1 Treatment and prognosis
  • H2 Complications
  • H1 History and etymology
  • H1 Differential diagnosis
  • H2 Clinical differential diagnosis
  • H1 Practical points
  • H1 See also

"Key differences between CT/MRI and CEUS"

Line 4:1 · "Key differences between CT/MRI and CEUS" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Patient selection"

Line 14:1 · "Patient selection" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Algorithm"

Line 29:1 · "Algorithm" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Major features"

Line 41:1 · "Major features" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Characterising washout"

Line 59:1 · "Characterising washout" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Ancilliary features"

Line 89:1 · "Ancilliary features" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Classification"

Line 114:1 · "Classification" should be H2, not H1.

"CEUS LR-1 (definitely benign)"

Line 115:1 · "CEUS LR-1 (definitely benign)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-2 (probably benign)"

Line 121:1 · "CEUS LR-2 (probably benign)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-3 (intermediate maglinancy probability)"

Line 130:1 · "CEUS LR-3 (intermediate maglinancy probability)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-4 (probably HCC)"

Line 136:1 · "CEUS LR-4 (probably HCC)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-5 (definitely HCC)"

Line 142:1 · "CEUS LR-5 (definitely HCC)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-M (probably or definitely malignant, but not HCC specific)"

Line 144:1 · "CEUS LR-M (probably or definitely malignant, but not HCC specific)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-TIV (tumour in vein)"

Line 150:1 · "CEUS LR-TIV (tumour in vein)" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"CEUS LR-NC"

Line 158:1 · "CEUS LR-NC" is not a recognised heading for this article type.

"Tie-breaking rules"

Line 160:1 · "Tie-breaking rules" is not a recognised heading for this article type.
Semicolons
suggestion

"CEUS LI-RADS is for diagnosis only and not for staging; it is only practical to characterise a limited number of targetted observations for each examination"

Line 6:62 · Use semicolons judiciously.

"washout characteristics with CEUS are different to CT/MRI, allowing assessment of true washout; hence, the CT/MRI LI-RADS terms "washout" or "washout appearance" are not used"

Line 8:102 · Use semicolons judiciously.
Oxford Comma
suggestion

"temporal reduction in enhancement (whole or part of the observation) relative to the background liver, during or after the arterial phase and becoming hypoenhancing to the background liver"

Line 53:104 · Use the Oxford comma in 'liver, during or after'.
Links
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0